Preferences and Perspectives - The Romantic Era
Impressionism Style
I personally really enjoy looking at Impressionism art, it's definitely one of my favorite styles. An old art teacher I had in high school always talked about how much she disliked Impressionism due to the chaos she felt when looking at it. While I do understand where he was coming from, I think there is a lot of beauty within that chaos and I personally find a lot of comfort from different colors and brush strokes.
Impressionism began in Paris towards the end of the 19th century and what makes this style so interesting and different is the fact that the content of the painting wasn't important. In Impressionism art, the way the artist painted was more important. This is because the characteristics don't really have anything to do with the subject matter; Impressionism is characterized by sketchy lines, loose brush strokes, and dabs of color that blend together. Of course, there is a reoccurring theme of subject matter but it wasn't the most important thing. Such subject matter includes pleasant moments, transitory effects of light and weather, and the amusements and pastimes of the middle/upper class. As you can tell, this style of art didn't really focus on traditional subject matter like history and religion.
"Water Lilies" by Claude Monet France, 1906 |
"La Grenouillére" by Pierre-Auguste Renoir France, 1869 |
Impressionism Elements of Art
Impressionism art is a beautiful style of art and it seems so simple at first, but in reality, the brush strokes and sketchy lines make it kind of chaotic. This style of art utilizes organic shapes with a two-dimensional form. Impressionists use curved/sketchy lines and loose/broken brushstrokes to help create these organic shapes and 2D forms. In addition, these lines and brushstrokes along with dabs of color help illustrate optical texture. These textures really emphasize that dream-like feeling we can see in Water Lilies and La Grenouillére.
Realist Style
Realism was developed in the mid 19th century and was a reaction again Romanticism. I personally am not a huge fan of the Realist style because I see it more as a snapshot of life rather than an adaptation of life. Does that make sense? Realism, to me, is a realistic painting of life. Why would that interest me when I can view the same thing with my own eyes? Unlike Impressionism, Realism focuses on ordinary subject matter like the middle class doing ordinary activities, farmworkers, nature, and livestock. This style of art is a real depiction of models and there is careful attention to detail.
"The Gleaners" by Jean-François Millet France, 1857 |
"Snap the Whip" by Winslow Homer Ohio, 1872 |
Realist Elements of Art
Realism is obviously a very realistic depiction of life through art and the elements of art seen in this style help with this depiction. There are very sober colors used throughout this style of art and this makes sense because life itself isn't very bright- unless you put a filter over it. The whole concept of Realism is to capture contemporary life and in order to capture that correctly, you need sober colors. These colors also help spark emotion. Since we are trying to capture real life in this style, there is no limit to what emotions you can feel- because life entails many different emotions. For example, in Millet's piece, his sober colors and subject matter made us feel depressing emotions. If he were to use brighter colors, we may have felt something different. In addition to color and emotion, Realism uses horizontal lines to define its form.
Impressionism and Realism
I'm a big fan of abstract art, and while Impressionism has a defined subject matter, there is something abstract about the painting thanks to the dabs of color and brushstrokes. The use of colors and loose brushstrokes create a captivating painting that makes you want to jump in and experience it. Realism, for me, is too realistic and is a bit more boring to look at. The main difference between Impressionism and Realism is the subject matter. Impressionists don't focus on traditional subject matter like Realists do. Instead, Impressionists' focus was to depict the fleeting moments of nature especially through the transitory effects of light. There was also more attentiveness to how the artist was feeling while painting. Realists on the other hand were more focused on the details of their subject matter and telling the truth as a perfect ideal.
Work Cited.
“La Grenouillère - Auguste Renoir - Google Arts & Culture.” Google, artsandculture.google.com/asset/la-grenouill%C3%A8re-auguste-renoir/HgHrOyFUfcFtLw?hl=en.
“Realism Movement Overview.” The Art Story, www.theartstory.org/movement/realism/.
Samu, Margaret. “Impressionism: Art and Modernity.” The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Oct. 2004, www.metmuseum.org/TOAH/hd/imml/hd_imml.htm.
I really love both of the paintings you chose for impressionism, I absolutely adore the water lilies, it simple yet beautifully done. I really enjoyed that quick fun fact about Renoir and Monet competing against each other. lol. "La Grenouille" is so gorgeous, it's so fascinating to look at, I would love to join them as well! the brushstrokes that Renoir places to give the water the reflection and the action of waves are just stunning. I also agree with you the realist era was not very interesting to look at, especially when it was just someone doing an ordinary thing such such farming. I do like the painting with the boys as well, it makes you feel like after all these death there's hope for us yet. Overall you chose great works to discuss about, really enjoyed learning about new pieces and enjoyed your discussion.
ReplyDelete